Tuesday, October 30, 2007

What's Your Halloween Candy Personality?


CANDY
ALMOND'S CANDY-GIVER ANALYSIS
HISTORY
CALORIE COUNT




3 Musketeers
Does well in groups but is somewhat pompous. Prone to fancy costumes and arcane weapons. Wears hats in public that are ill-advised.
Created in 1932 by Mars, the candy bar got its name because it originally had three pieces in one packet: vanilla, strawberry and chocolate.
The Fun Size (15 grams) has 63 calories.




Almond Joy
I'm going to put aside my aversion to coconut in praising these folks as happy-go-lucky.
Introduced in 1946 by the Peter Paul Candy Manufacturing Co. in New Haven, Conn. It's a companion to the Mounds bar, which arrived in 1920.
The snack size (17 grams) has 80 calories.





Bit-O-Honey
They have contradictory personalities, hoping to express generosity but also having the passive-aggressive desire to damage the fillings of trick-or-treaters.
The honey-flavored taffy was first manufactured in 1924 by the Schutter-Johnson Co. of Chicago. It is now made by Nestle.
One piece (7 grams) has 26 calories.




Butterfinger
Evasive, slippery, not necessarily to be trusted.
Invented in 1923 by the Curtiss Candy Co. of Chicago. The crunchy bar wrapped in chocolate is now made by Nestle.
The Fun Size (18.5 grams) has 85 calories.





Candy Corn
Purely deluded people. They don't get that candy shouldn't attempt to imitate other food groups, particularly corn.
Invented in the 1880s, it was first manufactured commercially by the Wunderle Candy Co. in Philadelphia and by the turn of the century at the Herman Goelitz Candy Co. in Cincinnati.
A serving of 22 pieces (40 grams) has 140 calories, or 6.4 calories per piece.





Good & Plenty
Optimistic, perhaps overly so. A little bit of Weimar energy. Strong advocate of gay rights; acquainted with the bitterness at the center of most lives.
The licorice candy was first produced in 1893 by the Quaker City Confectionery Co. in Philadelphia and is considered the oldest branded candy in the country.
A serving of 33 pieces (39 grams) has 140 calories, or 4.2 calories per piece.





Reese's Peanut Butter Cups
Generous souls. Those who understand the salty in life, as well as the sweet.
Created by Harry Burnett Reese in the 1920s. Reese was a former dairy employee of Milton Hershey, founder of the Hershey Co. In 1963, the Reese candy company was sold to Hershey for $23.5 million.
A one-cup package (21 grams) has 110 calories.





Snickers
Just going with the crowd, the safe candy choice, guaranteed to please the masses. Not ambitious, but dependable.
Created in 1930 by Mars, Snickers bars sold for a nickel. The Fun Size was introduced in 1968.
The Fun Size (17 grams) has 80 calories.





Twix
Both brittle and supple in social situations; sort of trapped between personality types.
A Mars product, caramel-and-cookie Twix bars were created in the United Kingdom in 1967 but weren't sold in the United States until 1979.
The Fun Size (16 grams) has 80 calories.





Twizzlers
Sickos. Truly demented. Plastic people living plastic lives.
The Twizzlers brand was introduced in 1929. The red licorice strips are manufactured by Y&S Candies, a company established in 1845 that is now a Hershey subsidiary.
The snack size (14 grams) has 37 calories.




Sara Jorde Photography
612-338-6923
www.jorde.com





Happy Beljorde Birthday Nancy!




Monday, October 29, 2007

It's getting pretty scary around here





Murphy's embarrassed by his halloween costume...




I think he looks rather fetching!

Friday, October 26, 2007

The Secret History of the Impending War with Iran That the White House Doesn't Want You to Know

Former high-ranking policy experts from the Bush Administration say the U.S. has been gearing up for a war with Iran for years, despite claiming otherwise. It'll be Iraq all over again.

By John H. Richardson

10/18/2007, 1:34 PM

In the years after 9/11, Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann worked at the highest levels of the Bush administration as Middle East policy experts for the National Security Council. Mann conducted secret negotiations with Iran. Leverett traveled with Colin Powell and advised Condoleezza Rice. They each played crucial roles in formulating policy for the region leading up to the war in Iraq. But when they left the White House, they left with a growing sense of alarm -- not only was the Bush administration headed straight for war with Iran, it had been set on this course for years. That was what people didn't realize. It was just like Iraq, when the White House was so eager for war it couldn't wait for the UN inspectors to leave. The steps have been many and steady and all in the same direction. And now things are getting much worse. We are getting closer and closer to the tripline, they say. Read the full story at Esquire

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Wii-hab



One of the latest crazes to hit the Wii world is rehab using the Wii console, known as Wii-hab. Wii-hab is an innovative way to use Wii interactivity to help those in physical therapy. Latest news reports like the one from Newsday suggest that although this isn’t a substitute for normal therapy it definitely has a benefit. Patients are showing increase range of mobility and physical well being.

Personally I think this is a great way to use the Wii. Anyone who has played any of the Wii Sports games for a couple hours knows what a work out it could be. The first time I played Wii tennis I was sore for two days. This is another great example of how the Wii reaches a huge audience of people, which will guarantee that the Wii will continue selling for a long time.

Friday, October 19, 2007

Northrup King Building






About Art Attack

Art Attack is an annual open studio and gallery crawl at the Northrup King Building, in the heart of the Northeast Minneapolis Arts District. The weekend-long event features hundreds of artists working in ceramics, glass, jewelry, mixed media, mosaics, painting, photography, pottery, sculpture, wood, textiles, and more.

Art Attack is the perfect foray into the holiday season, where visitors can find creative, one-of-a-kind gifts, meet the artists, learn about the creative processes, watch demonstrations, and support the arts during this festive event.

Art Attack Celebrates its 10th Year!








For the 10th annual Art Attack, a special show will run all weekend in the expansive group room. Resident artists will display artwork inspired by both the rich history of the building and the current energy and everyday activities that fill this massive creative center. Alongside this work, historic photos and cherished objects from the past, when the Northrup King Company was a thriving seed company, will be on display.

General Information

DATES & TIMES

Friday, November 2nd
5:00 to 10:00 p.m.
Saturday, November 3rd
12:00 to 8:00 p.m.
Sunday, November 4th
12:00 to 5:00 p.m.

LOCATION

The Northrup King Building
1500 Jackson Street NE
Minneapolis, MN 55413
directions

CONTACT INFORMATION

(612) 363-5612
info@northrupkingbuilding.com

Submitted by: Sara




Natalie goes to Jenny's school

Click on title above to go to Natalie's website

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

John Sullivan: The 515 ways Minnesota discriminates


People of the same gender in committed relationships are victimized by the state of Minnesota every day.
John Sullivan



Imagine a life in which many of your decisions -- both great and small -- are dictated by laws that are in opposition to your best health and economic interests. Imagine a government that expects you to obey its laws and pay its taxes even while it sanctions blatant discrimination against you, both in your everyday actions and in the monumental events of your life.

Many Minnesotans don't need to imagine. They live it every day.

For one parent, it's a trip to the family's credit union with her 6-year-old daughter to open the girl's first savings account -- a life lesson in thrifty behavior. After completing the paperwork, she is informed that the little girl's account isn't wanted because the parents aren't married. In the eyes of the credit union -- and under Minnesota laws -- the girl's legal parent isn't a family member of an employee of the company that sponsors the credit union.

For another Minnesotan, the effect is far more serious. The home she lived in for more than 15 years, the home she expected to return to after burying her life partner -- who died too young after a long, expensive illness -- is taken by the state. Around-the-clock care forced them on medical assistance after they exhausted all assets except their home. The woman was told that the state would place a lien on the home to recover the costs of care. If the couple had been married, Minnesota law would have protected the home. Because they weren't, the state acted quicker than Snidely Whiplash.

So, you say, the solution in these and thousands of other similar cases is for the couples to marry. But, of course, they can't. They are two people of the same gender who have made a lifelong commitment to each other, but who aren't allowed by law to formalize their relationship.

However, let's save the marriage debate for another day. The reality is that thousands of Minnesotans are in committed same-sex relationships -- in fact, 9,000 or more, according to census data. Many are raising families, and all are contributing to their communities. Yet, they are confronted every day with blatant discrimination -- not from the actions of individuals, but from the state that for everyone else is expected to assure equal rights under the law.

A recently released study found at least 515 Minnesota laws that treat unmarried but longtime committed couples differently than married partners. Much of this discrimination affects both same-sex and heterosexual families.

This state-sanctioned discrimination flies in the face of what most Minnesotans think is right. A statewide survey conducted last year found that nearly eight out of 10 Minnesotans said government shouldn't treat people differently because of their sexual orientation. The survey also found that almost 70 percent of Minnesotans said they believe "gays and lesbians should have the same rights and responsibilities as everyone else."

Yet, in 515 laws, the state treats gays and lesbians very differently. And as a result, it treats many families differently, including the children of these relationships -- children who are being raised to be decent, responsible citizens, yet who are learning harsh lessons at the hands of state government. These lessons aren't lost, even on 6-year-olds. The young girl who wanted a credit union savings account left the building clutching her piggy bank. Angry and frustrated, she refused to give anyone her money. "Would this be the policy if an employee who was also a grandparent, aunt or uncle wanted to open an account for a child?" her parent wonders. "If an employee wanted to open a joint account with a brother or sister, would they be refused?"

Probably not. But when it is the state that discriminates, where is the recourse?

Yet, over and over, our state's laws not only authorize unfair treatment, they demand it. For example, while family members of a patient in a public facility have the right to be notified if the patient is moved or if the patient's care has changed, these same facilities don't require notification of a patient's same-sex partner (Section 246.70). Or consider this: The spouse of a hospital patient is the first person a physician consults if the patient is unable to consent to treatment. But the same-sex partner of a patient is not included at all on the list of people who may provide consent (Section 253B.03).

In some instances, committed, same-sex couples are able to create contracts that anticipate and resolve the decisions and rights that most Minnesota families take for granted. But apart from the expense of establishing these contracts, how can anyone possibly predict all the twists and turns life holds for all of us?

And in many other cases, contracts do no good. It is Section 181.947 of Minnesota statutes, for example, that gives a person the right to take an unpaid leave of absence from work if a spouse is injured or killed during active military duty, but denies that same privilege to a domestic partner. Hospitals have refused to extend visiting rights to a same-sex partner even if he or she has legal paperwork describing the couple's wishes.

The report identifying Minnesota's 515 discriminatory laws isn't an advocacy document; it is a call for Minnesotans to understand the realities of same-sex families, to discuss the kind of state in which we want to live and to make decisions about what is right and what is wrong.

Many Minnesotans -- including many of the state's largest, best-known and most successful businesses -- already have had this discussion. Of Minnesota's Fortune 500 companies, 89 percent have developed policies to ensure that gay and lesbian employees do not encounter discrimination. And most have taken a step further to offer domestic-partner benefits to their employees.

Now it's time for all Minnesotans to have the same conversation -- not about marriage or civil unions or activist judges, but a conversation about fairness. A conversation that asks the question of whether we truly believe that all Minnesotans should be equal under the law. Today, that question has 515 wrong answers.

John Sullivan is senior vice president and general counsel of Imation Corp. He lives in Minneapolis.

Tuesday, October 09, 2007

Rob your health insurance company

We can make the health care industry perform like the computer industry, providing ever better quality at ever lower prices. We can . . .

* Make your health insurance belong to you, not your employer
* Make insurance premiums increasingly less expensive
* Eliminate insurance co-pays, fully fund your health insurance deductibles, and make insurance company denials of care almost completely disappear

We can even make affordable health care available to everyone, at all socio-economic levels. Better yet, the amount of money available to fund your health care could grow constantly. You could even be able to leave unspent health care funds to your children as an inheritance.

But that's not all. Our proposal would also save Medicare from its looming bankruptcy while making our economy vastly more productive!

All of these things can be done at once, with one simple change from Congress . . .

Congress must make it possible for you to rob your health insurance company.

We use the word "rob" as a metaphor. We want to take money that now goes to the health insurance companies, and to the federal government, and let you keep it. This will empower you to pay your health care expenses directly, without having to argue with your insurance provider, or the federal bureaucracy.

We also want you to be able to earn interest on that money, just like the insurance companies do now. Only we want those interest earnings to come to you tax free, so you can have an ever-increasing pool of money to fund your own health care.

Please understand, the only way insurance companies can stay in business is by taking more money from their customers than they pay out in benefits. And the federal government must do something similar. To cover the administrative costs for its health care programs it too must take in more than it pays out.

Worse still, the politicians always confiscate their own cut of your money and use it to reward friends and punish enemies. There's a lot of corporate welfare buried in federal government health care expenditures. This is money that powerful special interests are able to rob from your taxes because they have more insider clout than you do. We want you to rob this money back!

We want to cut out all the overhead and waste, from both the insurance companies and the federal government, so you can have the money to spend on your own health care. Here's how it would work . . .

The tax free money your employer now pays to your insurance company, or that you currently spend out of your own pocket after taxes, would instead go to a Health Savings Account (HSA). You would own and control this account. You would constantly earn compounding interest on this money, just like the insurance companies do now, only your interest earnings would accumulate tax free!

You would pay for both your basic medical expenses and major medical insurance out of your HSA. You would own the insurance policy, not your employer. You could buy a high-deductible major medical policy so the premiums would be low. Your HSA would pay both the premium and cover the deductible!

When you go to the doctor or the hospital you would simply whip out your HSA debit card and pay your bill up to the amount of your deductible. Your insurance company would pay any expenses above that amount. This means that all of your medical expenses would be fully funded, tax free, in advance, without co-pays.

Better yet, as the funds in your HSA grow you could raise the deductible on your insurance policy, and lower your insurance premium. The less insurance you need the more your premiums would shrink. And less dependence on health insurance would also reduce the risk that your insurance company would deny service or interfere with your treatment choices.

You would control what doctors you see, not the insurance companies. You would control what kind of treatment you receive, not the insurance companies. Your doctor would work for you, instead of for your insurance provider. And your insurance company would work for you too, instead of for your employer.

All of these benefits would be available to the self-employed and low income workers too, because any money deposited to an HSA would not only avoid the income tax, but Social Security and Medicare taxes too. These are the taxes that hurt the self-employed and low wage earners the most.

These tax savings, along with low premium major medical insurance, would make health care affordable for nearly everyone. This approach might even reduce the number of people who are dependent on existing government health care programs, reducing the future economic stress on Medicare and Medicaid.

Powerful things will happen when we reach this state of affairs. When people are spending their own money for health care they will start being cost conscious. They will want to keep as much money in their HSAs as they possibly can, so the interest they earn will compound, their balance will grow, and the amount of insurance they need will shrink.

People will start asking what procedures cost, and start looking for better prices! When doctors and hospitals have to start providing prices in advance they will start to compete with each other, on both price and quality. Indeed, THIS IS ALREADY HAPPENING!

Thanks to the horrors of dealing with insurance companies, many doctors are establishing cash-only practices with lower prices, and they are advertising these prices to attract customers!

Still other companies are being created to provide a wide range of basic medical services at lower pre-published prices with shorter waiting times. They are doing this inside shopping malls!

This is happening for two reasons . . .

1. Our current model of health insurance makes no sense. It's entirely driven by federal tax policies that create financial incentives for the dominance of Cadillac health care plans tied to employment. If car insurance worked like this it would . . .

* cover gasoline and oil changes
* limit your choice of gas stations and mechanics to those dictated by your insurance company
* hide the costs from you, the customer, and only make them visible to your insurance company
* impose co-pays at the pump
* force you to switch car insurance providers every time you change jobs
* cause your insurance company to ration your use of gas, oil, and auto repairs
* strangle mechanics in regulations and paper work
* make prices and premiums soar to the sky while reducing the quantity and quality of available services!

To avoid these negative side effects doctors and medical service entrepreneurs are already creating low price cash alternatives, and this trend is now accelerating because . . .

2. HSAs already exist in a limited form. Even limited HSAs are already changing the face of health care. They are providing incentives for the creation of new, lower cost alternatives, like doctors in malls and cash-only practices with competitive pricing.

To understand the wonderful things that would happen if Congress removed the legal chains from HSAs, you only have to look at what has already happened to the cost and quality of elective medical procedures. Lasik eye surgery, which isn't covered by most insurance plans, is a perfect example . . .

The quality of Lasik procedures has soared while the price has plummeted, just like in the unregulated computer industry!

According to the federal government's Bureau of Labor Statistics the cost of the Lasik procedure has dropped from $2,106 in 1999 to $1,626 in 2004! This is the exact opposite of what has happened to costs and quality in the government and insurance company dominated portion of the health care industry!

This has happened because Lasik doctors have to compete for customers who are paying with their own money. Unlimited HSAs would cause these competitive pressures to be applied to the entire health care industry, giving us ever increasing quality at ever lower prices.

Congress could give us this benefit by making just three changes to existing law . . .

* Remove the limits on how much can be contributed to an HSA
* Make insurance premiums tax deductible and allow them to be paid out of HSAs
* Remove legal mandates on what kind of insurance people must have -- this will permit companies to provide a variety of competing policies at a variety of competing prices

Why should you send your money to an insurance company, or to the federal government, so they can do at a higher cost, and with less quality, what you could do for yourself at less cost, and with better quality!

But there are even more benefits to unlimited HSAs. As they reduce the cost of health care, they will also lessen the financial pressure on government provided health care programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. And as more people have more money in their HSAs fewer people will need to rely on these programs.

Unlimited HSAs could help prevent the looming bankruptcy of Medicare. Better yet . . .

Congress could also create HSAs for people dependent on government programs. Instead of paying doctors and hospitals directly, the government could make deposits to their HSAs. This would greatly expand the competitive pressures on doctors and hospitals to improve quality and lower prices. But that's still not all . . .

Unlimited HSAs would dramatically increase the U.S. savings rate, creating a huge pool of capital to drive economic expansion, making all of us richer and happier.

We can do this, or we can follow the failed example of the countries with socialist health care systems, which provide poorer care at a greater cost with long and often deadly waiting lists for treatment.

If you want ever improving health care at ever lower costs, please send a message to Congress. In your personal comments ask them to . . .

* Remove the limits on how much can be contributed to an HSA
* Make insurance premiums tax deductible and allow them to be paid out of HSAs
* Remove mandates on what kind of insurance people must have, thereby permitting companies to provide a variety of competing policies at a variety of competing prices

Be healthy, be happy, be rich. Do it now.

Please, also consider making a contribution to further our work.

Thank you for being a DC Downsizer.

Perry Willis
Communications Director
DownsizeDC.org, Inc.

Friday, October 05, 2007

U's huge plant info database now available free online

Anybody with a question and a computer can get plant information for free now that the University of Minnesota has opened its online plant information database to the public.

By Tim Harlow, Star Tribune

Last update: October 05, 2007 – 10:16 AM

Anybody with a question and a computer can get plant information free now that the University of Minnesota has opened its online plant information database to the public.

The database, previously accessible only by subscribers, is one of the world's largest collections of information and images for botanical and horticultural and plant enthusiasts and scholars.

Called Plant Information Online, the database dates to the 1970s when it was an unpublished collection of printed resources. It was printed for the first time in 1976 and converted to a subscription-based web site in 1997.

The site at plantinfo.umn.edu/arboretum/default.asp features information on where to buy plants and seeds, links to more than 2,000 North American seed and nursery farms, more than 300,000 citations to plants in science and garden magazines and books, and links to expert-selected websites on growing plants in all regions of the United States and Canada.

Tim Harlow • harlow@startribune.com

Thursday, October 04, 2007

Referendum Levy Facts

School Board News
1. Board approves potential cuts
The Anoka-Hennepin School Board recently approved a list of potential reductions in staff, programs and services. These reductions will be incorporated into the budget for the 2008-09 school year if referendum levy questions going to the voters November 6 are not approved.

Without the levy, the district will face
a $41 to $42 million deficit for the 2008-09 school year. This figure includes the loss of approximately $25-$26 million in referendum levy dollars from the five-year levy approved by voters in 2002 that is now expiring. It also includes approximately $4 million from the impact of inflation over the five years of the levy, and approximately $12 million resulting from inflationary costs not covered by state funding.

Totaling $42.3 million, the reductions include closing up to six elementary schools, two middle schools and one high school, which would change all attendance area boundaries in the district. Also on the list is elimination of 507 regular education teachers, which would increase class size by six to 12 students, depending on the grade and school. Another 239 positions would be cut including administrators, special education staff, instructional coaches not funded by grants, technology support teachers, counselors, secretaries, paraprofessionals and custodians.

The reductions would result in increased class sizes at all grade levels. Class size would increase by six to 12 students at the elementary level, depending on the grade and number of classes at each grade in a particular school. Middle school classes would increase an average of 8.5 students and high school classes an average of seven students. These averages are based on simulations that applied the cuts in staff to actual schools of varying levels and sizes to determine the outcome.

The cuts would also result in loss of courses and programs for students. At the elementary level, specialty teachers for one area - art, music or physical education - would be eliminated as well as the Talent Development Program teachers funded by the 2002 levy.

At the middle and high school level it is more difficult to say which specific courses would be eliminated because it would depend, in part, on student registration. However, students would have fewer opportunities to take electives. At both middle and high school level, study halls supervised by paraprofessionals may be substituted for some elective choices. A new high school program schedule would be implemented that would reduce the number of class terms a student would take from 64 to 48.

Middle school courses supported by the 2002 levy, such as advanced math, as well as some electives would be eliminated. Some elective and low enrollment high school courses such as International Baccalaureate, Advanced Placement and career and technical education courses would likely be eliminated.

High school activities, such as sports, debate and marching band, would be affected by higher fees. Fees would likely increase to cover the actual cost of offering the activity. The increase would vary by activity, but would average approximately $500. Programs that do not remain viable with the higher fees would be eliminated. The fees students currently pay do not cover the full cost of the activity.

The board took comment from citizens who attended public meetings Sept. 13 and 18 to comment on potential cuts. Board members announced their intention to formally approve a list of cuts so voters would know exactly what is at stake when they vote. The board took this approach for the 2002 levy after voters in 2001 said they didn't fully understand what would be cut if they voted no.

As informal discussion of potential cuts has circulated in the district over the past few weeks, some citizens characterized the cuts as a threat or said they didn't believe the district would actually carry them out if the levy was not approved. During the public meetings Superintendent Roger Giroux stressed the reality. "It's frustrating to hear, 'they're bluffing.' Folks, it's $42 million we won't have next year. Regardless of the vote, we have to provide the best education possible," he said.

Most citizens who spoke during the hearings said they preferred no cuts. Some suggested that the district first cut the "nickels and dimes" and cut administrators before cutting items that directly impact students. Prior to the 2002 levy, the district made cuts year after year, trying to avoid items that directly impacted students. Since the salaries of teachers and others who work directly with students are the largest share of the budget, it is difficult to make cuts without eliminating teachers and other positions that directly affect students.

"The board has always said, 'try to manage through without any cuts to students,' and we have always tried to do that," said Dr. Giroux. "People in the hearings said, 'watch your nickels and dimes.' You bet. We have always done that." The district's financial records bear this out. Independent auditors who review the district's finances each year have characterized the district as a "low cost, best buy" for providing an "above average program at a below average cost."

Nevertheless, the board directed the superintendent to find small ways to economize. Dr. Giroux promised to "capture anything that will put another teacher in front of the kids."

More information about the referendum levy and ballot proposal as well a potential cuts will be mailed to citizens prior to the election. It is also available on the Web site. Click on the following link to reach the Levy 2007 section:
www.anoka.k12.mn.us/levy2007

Wednesday, October 03, 2007